Allahabad High Court Judgement

Allahabad High Court Judgement

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice at mail@myadvocates.club
JUDGEMENT HEADLINE : Second Appeal-counsel For The Appellant Not Present-repeated Adjournments-Second Appeal Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution.
JUDGEMENT TITLE : Gulam Zilani Vs. Abdul Rahman And Another. On 07/08/2006 By Allahabad High Court
CASE NO : SECOND APPEAL NO. 421 OF 1984.
CORAM : Hon'ble Satya Poot Mehrotra,J.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No. 48
Second Appeal No. 421 Of 1984
Gulam Zilani ................................Defendant-Appellant.
Versus
Abdul Rahman And Another ...............Proforma-Defendant-Respondent.
******
Hon'ble S.P. Mehrotra, J.
List Has Been Revised.
Learned Counsel For The Defendant-appellant Are Not Present.
Sri Sanjeev Kumar Holding Brief For Sri Shashi Nandan, Learned Counsel For The Plaintiff-respondent Is Present.
A Perusal Of The Orders Dated 16-11-2005, 16-12-2005, 30-01-2006, 06-03-2006, 20-03-2006 And 03-04-2006 Passed On The Order-Sheet Show That The Case Has Been Repeatedly Adjourned On Account Of The Reasons Mentioned In The Respective Orders Passed On The Said Dates.
Pursuant To The Order Dated 3-4-2006, The Case Is Listed Today.
As Noted Above, Even Though The Case Has Been Taken Up In The Revised List Today, Still The Learned Counsel For The Defendant-appellant Are Not Present.
In View Of The Above, There Is No Option But To Dismiss The Second Appeal For Want Of Prosecution.
The Second Appeal Is, Accordingly, Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution.

Go to Navigation