Allahabad High Court Judgement

Allahabad High Court Judgement

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice at mail@myadvocates.club
JUDGEMENT HEADLINE : Second Appeal-Counsel Reporting No Instructions-Second Appeal Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution.
JUDGEMENT TITLE : Subedar Vs. Ram Swaroop & Others. On 21/07/2006 By Allahabad High Court
CASE NO : SECOND APPEAL NO. 2574 OF 1983
CORAM : Hon'ble Satya Poot Mehrotra,J.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No.48

Second Appeal No. 2574 Of 1983
Subedar ........................Plaintiff-Appellant.
Versus
Ram Swaroop And Others ......................Defendants-Respondents.
*****
Hon'ble S.P.Mehrotra, J.

Sri R.L. Yadav Holding Brief For Sri Satya Prakash, Advocate, Whose Name Has Been Shown In The Cause List As The Learned Counsel For The Plaintiff-appellant, States That Despite Repeated Complications Having Been Sent To The Plaintiff-appellant, The Plaintiff-appellant Has Not Contacted Sri Satya Prakash For Giving Instructions In The Matter.
In The Circumstances, Sri Satya Prakash Has No Further Instructions In The Matter.
In View Of The Statement Made By Sri R.L. Yadav Holding Brief For Sri Satya Prakash, Advocate, Whose Name Has Been Shown In The Cause List As The Learned Counsel For The Plaintiff-appellant, The Second Appeal Is Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution.

Go to Navigation